Skip to main content
Back to Blog

Unenforceable HOA Rules in West Virginia

by Stephen
A scarlet bee balm bloom in sharp focus with additional red blooms visible behind it
Photo by Teri Neville via iNaturalist, CC0

The short version

  • West Virginia has no native-plant or landscaping-protection statute, unlike Texas Property Code 202.007 or California Civil Code 4735.
  • The Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act (Chapter 36B) fully applies only to communities created on or after July 1, 1986 (36B-1-201, verified at code.wvlegislature.gov).
  • Older communities get only the narrow list of sections carried over by 36B-1-204, and the declaration-amendment rules are not on that list.
  • The fine power at 36B-3-102(a)(11) DOES carry over to older communities and requires notice and an opportunity to be heard, but sets no dollar cap and no day count on either side, unlike Virginia or Ohio.
  • West Virginia has overridden covenants for solar since 2012 (36-4-19) and has never done so for landscaping.
  • No West Virginia covenant-expiration or marketable-title statute exists. All 13 articles of Chapter 36 were checked. A circulating claim that one sits in Chapter 36 Article 10 is wrong; that article is the Transfer on Death Security Registration Act.

Quick answer

West Virginia has no native-plant or landscaping-protection statute. Its association law, the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act, only fully governs communities created on or after July 1, 1986. Older subdivisions get a narrow slice of it at best. Even where the act applies, the fine procedure only requires notice and a chance to be heard, with no dollar cap and no day count on either side. What you actually have is a right to be heard, not a right to a specific outcome, and your recorded declaration decides the rest.

A lot of guidance online implies every state has some law shielding native or drought-tolerant landscaping from an HOA. West Virginia does not. What West Virginia does have is a common interest ownership act with an unusual wrinkle: whether it applies to your community at all often depends on when your subdivision was recorded, not on what your covenants say.

This is a plain-English summary, not a fight plan. Most of these disputes end quietly once a homeowner reads their declaration closely and asks the board to follow its own process.

The honest starting point: no landscaping statute

Texas has Property Code §202.007, which bars an HOA from prohibiting water-conserving and native landscaping. California has Civil Code §4735, which protects low-water landscaping. West Virginia has nothing comparable. No West Virginia statute says an association cannot require turf grass, cannot ban native beds, or has to accept a pollinator planting.

The act that might govern you, depending on a date

West Virginia's association law is Chapter 36B, the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act. It is mandatory, not opt-in like Georgia's. But its reach is limited in a way most homeowners never check: § 36B-1-201 provides that the chapter applies to all common interest communities created within this state after the effective date of this chapter (opens in new tab), which was July 1, 1986.

A "common interest community" under § 36B-1-103 is not limited to condominiums. A standard subdivision counts as a planned community, and a planned community is a common interest community, as long as owning a lot obligates you to pay for maintenance or improvement of shared real estate described in a declaration. If your neighborhood has a mandatory HOA and dues that cover common areas, it is very likely a common interest community for purposes of this chapter. The open question is not whether the structure fits, it is whether your subdivision was created before or after the 1986 cutoff.

Created before July 1, 1986? Most of the act does not apply to you

Section 36B-1-204 (opens in new tab) lists exactly which parts of Chapter 36B reach a community created before the effective date, and it is a short list: separate taxation of units, applicability of local ordinances and building codes, eminent domain, construction and validity of the declaration, description of units, merger of communities, a subset of association powers (including the fine-and-hearing power below), tort and contract liability, the assessment lien, association records, resale disclosures, and the effect of a violation on the right to sue. Everything else in the chapter, including the declaration-amendment rules, does not apply. A subdivision that predates 1986 runs almost entirely on its own recorded declaration.

Communities with twelve or fewer units get an even narrower slice under a related exception in § 36B-1-205. A lot of West Virginia's housing stock is older than 1986, so this is worth checking before you assume the statute answers anything for your street.

The one right that reaches almost every community: notice and a hearing, with no numbers attached

Here is the part of Chapter 36B that matters most for a landscaping dispute, and it is one of the few pieces that applies whether your community was created in 1975 or 2015. Section 36B-3-102(a)(11) (opens in new tab) lets an association levy reasonable fines for violations of the declaration, bylaws, or rules, but only after notice and an opportunity to be heard. That paragraph is one of the ones carried over to pre-1986 communities by § 36B-1-204, so the right to be heard before a fine sticks is close to universal in West Virginia.

What the statute does not say

Compare this with neighboring states in this series. Virginia caps fines at $50 for a single offense or $10 per day, capped at 90 days, and requires 14 days notice with a decision within 7. Ohio gives the homeowner exactly 10 days to request a hearing or lose the right. West Virginia's § 36B-3-102(a)(11) has no dollar cap and no day count on either the association's notice or your response. The statutory text and the secondary sources we could confirm it against are consistent on this point, but neither specifies a number, so we are summarizing the requirement rather than quoting a number that does not exist. "Reasonable" and "an opportunity to be heard" are the only standards written into the statute itself.

That is weaker than it sounds, and stronger than it sounds, depending on which way you look at it. Weaker, because there is no ceiling on a fine beyond the word "reasonable," and no deadline forcing the board to move quickly or forfeit the charge. Stronger, because "reasonable" is itself an argument. A fine that keeps accruing with no explanation, or one wildly out of line with what neighbors have paid for comparable violations, is exactly the kind of fact pattern that undercuts a reasonableness standard. Ask, in writing, what makes the amount reasonable and what comparable fines the association has issued.

Even-handed enforcement

Selective enforcement is one of the strongest positions a West Virginia homeowner has, and it matters more here precisely because so little of the fine process is pinned down by numbers. If your native bed is cited while comparable or messier yards nearby are not, document it. Dated photos of uncited yards go directly to whether the fine is "reasonable" and consistent, which is the one standard the statute actually gives you.

If there is no HOA at all, just a deed restriction

Not every West Virginia neighborhood with landscaping rules has an association behind them. Older subdivisions sometimes carry only a restrictive covenant recorded in the deed, with no HOA, no board, and no dues. A land-use restriction of that kind can still bind later owners as a matter of general property law, association or not. In that situation there is no fine, no notice-and-hearing right, and no board to appeal to, because there is no board. Enforcement is a lawsuit by a neighbor who benefits from the restriction, typically seeking an injunction, which is a very different fight than a fine dispute and one where a real estate attorney is worth involving early.

West Virginia protects solar, and has for over a decade. Not planting.

Outside Chapter 36B entirely, West Virginia has picked one thing to override a covenant on, and it is not your garden.

W. Va. Code § 36-4-19 covers solar, and only solar

Added by the Legislature in 2012, § 36-4-19 (opens in new tab)provides that "any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any governing document of a housing association executed or recorded after the effective date of this section that effectively prohibits or restricts the installation or use of a solar energy system is void and unenforceable." The association may still set reasonable restrictions that do not eliminate the system's energy value, and the override only reaches documents executed or recorded after the section took effect, so an older declaration that already banned solar panels is not automatically overridden.

There is no landscaping, native plant, or turf provision anywhere in it. The pattern holds here the same way it has in every state checked so far in this series: legislators will override a covenant when they choose to, and they have not chosen to for planting.

Checked and not found: a covenant-expiration statute

Some states let an old restriction age out on its own, through a marketable-title or covenant-expiration act, regardless of what an HOA does. We checked every article of Chapter 36 (Estates and Property) for one. It is not there. One search result surfaced a claim that West Virginia's expiration provisions live in "Chapter 36, Article 10," but Article 10 is the Uniform Transfer on Death Security Registration Act, which has nothing to do with real covenants. We are flagging that explicitly rather than repeating it, the same way earlier posts in this series caught a fabricated statute number in New Mexico. If a West Virginia covenant-expiration statute exists, we did not find it, and you should not assume an old restriction has quietly expired.

Changing the rule itself takes a supermajority, if the act applies to you

For communities created after July 1, 1986, § 36B-2-117 (opens in new tab) sets the default bar for amending the declaration at votes representing 67 percent of the association, unless the declaration itself sets a higher bar. This section is not on the list of provisions carried over to pre-1986 communities, so if your subdivision predates the act, the amendment threshold is whatever your own declaration says it is, not this default.

What your HOA can still require

Because West Virginia supplies so little statutory leverage on the substance of a landscaping rule, be realistic about what a clearly written declaration can enforce:

  • Turf grass, or a minimum percentage of lawn, where the declaration says so plainly
  • Pre-approval of landscaping changes through an architectural review committee
  • Maintenance standards covering dead plants, overgrowth, and edging
  • Height limits near sidewalks, driveways, and street sight lines
  • Rules about raised beds, borders, trellises, and other structures
  • Setback and screening requirements

The productive path is usually to design something the declaration can accept, then use the notice-and-hearing right to make sure you are treated fairly while you do it. West Virginia does not currently have a statewide turf-replacement rebate, but check our West Virginia rebate page for utility-level programs worth checking before you plan the work.

How to respond when the rules feel unfair

  1. 1Find out when your community was created.Check your declaration's recording date against July 1, 1986. That single fact determines whether Chapter 36B applies to you in full, in part, or not at all, and it changes what you can cite.
  2. 2Ask for the rule in writing.Request the exact recorded provision being cited, by section. A verbal warning is not an enforceable violation, and the language often says less than the board believes.
  3. 3Use the notice-and-hearing right, and push on "reasonable."Ask when notice went out, what the hearing process is, and what makes the fine amount reasonable. With no statutory cap or clock, reasonableness and consistency with how other owners were treated are your strongest levers.
  4. 4Submit a tidy plan.Give the review committee something concrete: a plant list, a simple layout, and a maintenance schedule. A clearly intentional design is far easier for a board to accept than a request framed as a challenge.

When to involve a lawyer

  • You are being fined and cannot tell whether the declaration actually supports the citation
  • The association is threatening a lien
  • You cannot tell whether your community was created before or after July 1, 1986, or which parts of Chapter 36B apply to you
  • No notice was given, or no chance to be heard was offered, before a fine was assessed

Because so much of a West Virginia dispute turns on a recording date and the exact wording of your own declaration, a West Virginia real estate attorney who can pull your community's recording history is often the fastest way to know where you actually stand.

This is not legal advice.

We are a gardening app, not lawyers. This post summarizes publicly available West Virginia law as of 2026. West Virginia has no native-plant or landscaping-protection statute, whether the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act applies to your community depends on when it was created, and every dispute is different. If you are facing fines or legal threats, talk to a real estate attorney in West Virginia.

People also ask

Does West Virginia have a law protecting native landscaping from HOAs?

No. West Virginia has no native-plant, pollinator, or xeriscape statute, and nothing comparable to Texas Property Code §202.007 or California Civil Code §4735. If your recorded declaration clearly requires turf grass, West Virginia law generally lets the association enforce it. Your leverage comes from the wording of that declaration and from the notice-and-hearing right before a fine is imposed.

Does the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act apply to every West Virginia HOA?

Not automatically. Chapter 36B fully applies only to common interest communities created on or after July 1, 1986. Communities created before that date get a much narrower set of provisions carried over by § 36B-1-204, including a subset of the association's fine power but not the declaration-amendment rules. Check your declaration's recording date before assuming the statute answers your question.

How much can a West Virginia HOA fine me for a landscaping violation?

Section 36B-3-102(a)(11) requires notice and an opportunity to be heard before a fine, and requires the fine to be reasonable, but it sets no dollar cap and no day count, unlike Virginia's $50/$10-per-day caps or Ohio's 10-day hearing-request deadline. If you are being fined, ask what makes the amount reasonable and what comparable violations have cost other owners.

Does West Virginia protect rooftop solar from HOA restrictions?

Yes, and this is the contrast worth noticing. W. Va. Code § 36-4-19, added in 2012, voids a covenant that effectively prohibits or restricts a solar energy system if that covenant was executed or recorded after the section took effect. West Virginia chose to override declarations for solar and has not done so for landscaping.

Can a West Virginia HOA make me keep a grass lawn?

If the recorded declaration clearly requires turf grass or a minimum percentage of lawn, then generally yes. West Virginia has no statute overriding a turf requirement the way Texas does. A vague tidiness or maintenance clause is not the same as a turf mandate, and you are still entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard before any fine is assessed.

Planning a native yard in West Virginia?

Pollinator Patch helps you build a plant plan that fits your declaration, with the tidy documentation review committees respond to. Plant list, layout, and maintenance schedule, all printable.

See a finished plan for a yard like this