Quick answer: Wyoming has no native-plant, xeriscape, or landscaping-protection law, and no general homeowners association statute at all. Wyoming does have a Solar Rights Act, but it governs line-of-sight disputes between neighbors and local government permitting, not private HOA covenants, so it gives you nothing to cite against a board. Wyoming does offer one angle most states in this series do not: its marketable title law (W.S. 34-10-101 through 109) can void a recorded use restriction, including a subdivision's landscaping covenant, after forty years unless it was preserved, either by a recorded notice of claim or because a deed in your chain of title specifically identifies the recorded covenant. For anything short of that, your leverage comes from what your recorded declaration says, whether the board followed its own procedure, and whether it enforces the same rule on every yard.
A lot of guidance online implies that every state has some law shielding native or drought-tolerant landscaping from an HOA. Wyoming does not, and citing a statute that does not exist is the fastest way to lose credibility with a board. What follows is what governs a landscaping dispute in Wyoming, plus one angle worth checking that is easy to miss.
This is a plain-English summary, not a fight plan. Most of these disputes end quietly once a homeowner reads their covenants closely and asks the association to apply them evenly.
The starting point: no landscaping statute
Texas has Property Code §202.007, which bars an HOA from prohibiting drought-resistant landscaping or water-conserving natural turf. California has Civil Code §4735, which protects low-water landscaping and blocks fines during drought. Wyoming has nothing comparable. No Wyoming statute says an association cannot require turf grass, cannot ban native beds, or has to approve a xeriscape plan, even in a state where summer water restrictions are common outside its few larger towns.

So in Wyoming, the landscaping rules live in your subdivision's recorded declaration and covenants. The room to push back is about how that document is written and how the board applies it, not about a state law that overrides it.

Wyoming has no umbrella HOA act at all
Many states in this series have at least a thin statewide statute setting out how an association forms, how it can lien a property, or what notice an owner is owed. Wyoming does not have one for a standard single-family subdivision. Title 34 of the Wyoming Statutes, the property title that would hold such an act, runs from Chapter 1 through Chapter 30 and covers marketable titles, platting, condominium ownership, the Uniform Commercial Code, solar rights, and notarial acts, among others. There is no chapter creating a homeowners association act, and the phrases "planned community" and "common interest community" do not appear anywhere in the title. The only reference to a homeowners' association is a passing one in Chapter 28, which exempts association assessments from the ban on private transfer fees. You can confirm this directly against the Wyoming Legislature's own compiled text of Title 34, Property, Conveyances and Security Transactions (opens in new tab).
What Title 34 does regulate, and what it does not
Chapter 20, the Condominium Ownership Act, is only four sections long (W.S. 34-20-101 through 104). It recognizes condominium ownership as a fee simple estate in an air space unit plus an undivided interest in common elements, and requires the declaration to be recorded, but it says nothing about landscaping and does not reach a standard subdivision of detached single-family homes at all. If you live in a condominium, this chapter is your starting point. If you live in a typical subdivision HOA, it does not apply to you.

That leaves the recorded declaration doing almost all the work. Where a Wyoming association has incorporated, which is the common structure, it also operates under the general Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation Act (W.S. 17-19-101 through 1807), which governs how the corporation holds meetings, keeps records, and handles its own internal governance. It is a general corporate statute, not one written for homeowners associations specifically, and it has nothing to say about what an architectural review committee can require of a front yard. Verified against the Legislature's compiled text of Title 17, Corporations, Partnerships and Associations (opens in new tab).

The Solar Rights Act does not reach HOA covenants either
Several states in this series turn out to override an HOA's power to restrict rooftop solar while saying nothing about landscaping. It would be easy to assume Wyoming's Solar Rights Act does the same thing. It does not, and this is worth spelling out because the name invites the wrong conclusion.
What the Solar Rights Act covers
W.S. 34-22-101 through 106 defines a "solar right" as a property right to an unobstructed line-of-sight path from a solar collector to the sun, and sets rules for disputes between neighboring property owners over shading, plus a solar permit system run by local governments (a city, town, or county). Read the text in full at the Legislature's compiled Title 34 (opens in new tab), Chapter 22. The words "association" and "covenant" do not appear anywhere in it, and it never mentions a recorded subdivision declaration. This is a neighbor-versus-neighbor and homeowner-versus-local-government statute. It has nothing to say about whether your HOA can require board approval for a rooftop system or ban one outright.

The practical result is that Wyoming has no landscaping override and no solar override that reaches an HOA either. The legislature has simply not written either exception into an association's authority over a recorded declaration.
The angle most states in this series do not have: a covenant that can expire
This is the one place Wyoming gives a homeowner something most no-statute states cannot offer, and it comes from property law rather than HOA law. Two earlier posts in this series, Massachusetts and Wisconsin, found that an old restrictive covenant can become unenforceable after enough years under a state time-limit statute. Wyoming gets to a similar place through its marketable title law, and on this specific point it is worth checking carefully before you rely on it.

W.S. 34-10-101 through 109: a forty-year window, and use restrictions are named
Wyoming's marketable title law says that a person with an unbroken forty-year chain of recorded title has marketable title, free of older claims, subject only to the exceptions the Act lists. Section 34-10-104(a)(i) specifically calls out "easements, use restrictions or other interests created prior to the root of title" as the kind of claim that is not preserved by a mere general reference in the chain of title, meaning a subdivision's recorded landscaping covenant is the type of interest this Act reaches. Section 34-10-105 then states that anything not preserved becomes "null and void." Verified against the Legislature's compiled text of Title 34, Chapter 10 (opens in new tab).
The exceptions in Section 34-10-108 are narrow and specific: lease reversions, railroad and utility easements, water rights, mineral and timber interests, state and federal claims, and conservation easements. Subdivision use restrictions are not on that list. That distinction matters, because Oklahoma's otherwise similar act, 16 O.S. §76, explicitly excepts "use restrictions or area agreements which are part of a plan for subdivision development" from its own extinguishment rule, which is the opposite result. Wyoming wrote no such exception. That is the difference between a state where this angle works and one where it does not.

Two things keep this from being simple arithmetic you can do on your own porch. First, the forty-year clock runs from the "root of title," the most recent recorded conveyance at least forty years old, not from when the subdivision was platted, so you need a title search to establish the date, not a guess based on the neighborhood's age. Second, and more important, an association is not required to sit passively and lose the restriction. Section 34-10-106 lets anyone claiming the interest, including the association, file a notice of claim in the county clerk's office at any point during that forty-year window to preserve the restriction. Many active Wyoming HOAs, especially ones with attentive legal counsel, will have already done this or will do it the moment the question is raised. A restriction is not automatically dead just because a subdivision is old. It is only dead if it predates your root of title, no notice of claim was filed, and no deed in your chain of title specifically identifies the recorded document that created it. Section 34-10-104 preserves a restriction that is specifically identified that way, and it also preserves any interest created by a document recorded after the root of title. Confirming that takes a title company or a real estate attorney pulling your specific chain of title.
Do not act on this arithmetic alone
If your subdivision was platted and its covenants first recorded more than forty years ago, this is worth raising with a Wyoming real estate attorney or a title company. It is not worth announcing to your board on your own confidence. Get the root-of-title date and confirm no notice of claim was filed before you treat a covenant as unenforceable.

A political-sign bill shows the legislature has been asked to limit HOAs, and has not, twice
Missouri's covenant-override statute protects political displays, solar devices, for-sale signs, and backyard chickens, and landscaping is absent. Wyoming offers a version of the same lesson, but from the other direction: a bill to limit HOA authority was introduced in 2023 and again in 2025, and it did not become law either time.
Two failed attempts at W.S. 22-25-116
House Bill 189 in the 2023 session and House Bill 339 in the 2025 session were both titled "Homeowners associations-display of political campaign signs" and both would have created a new section, W.S. 22-25-116, barring an association from prohibiting the display of campaign signs on a member's property, subject to reasonable size, timing, and placement rules. Both bills read "W.S. 22-25-116 is created to read," the language used for a section that does not yet exist, and as of this writing that section number is occupied by a different, unrelated law, the Wyoming ban on foreign funding of statewide ballot measures. Neither the 2023 nor the 2025 political-sign bill was enacted. You can read the introduced text of HB0189 (2023) (opens in new tab) and HB0339 (2025) (opens in new tab) on the Legislature's own site.
The lesson is not that Wyoming protects political signs, because it currently does not. The lesson is that the legislature has been asked twice that we found to carve an exception out of HOA authority and has not done it for signs, and we found no bill asking for one for landscaping. That silence is a choice available to lawmakers, not evidence of a right you can already claim. Never cite a bill as if it were current law. If either bill is enacted in a future session, this changes.

Where you do have leverage
You still have options. Four things carry weight in Wyoming, and they matter more here because the declaration is doing almost all the work.
What the declaration says
Boards sometimes enforce a rule that is not in the recorded document, or stretch a general maintenance clause to cover something it does not clearly reach. A clause requiring a yard be "kept neat" is not the same as a clause requiring turf grass. Ask for the exact recorded provision and the page it appears on, not a paraphrase from a newsletter or a board member's memory.

Whether the restriction is still alive under the forty-year rule
If your subdivision predates roughly the mid-1980s, ask a title company to pull the root of title and confirm whether the covenant was ever the subject of a recorded notice of claim under W.S. 34-10-106. This will not apply to most Wyoming subdivisions, since a large share of the state's residential growth is newer than forty years, but where it applies it is a strong position.
Even-handed enforcement
Selective enforcement carries weight in Wyoming because the association's authority rests entirely on a private document it is expected to apply consistently. If your native bed is cited while similar or messier yards nearby are not, document it with dated photos. That inconsistency undercuts the citation and often ends the dispute without a fight.

Whether the board followed its own procedure
Where the association is incorporated, the Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation Act sets baseline requirements for meetings, notice, and recordkeeping. A board that adopted a new landscaping rule without following its own bylaws, or that never properly noticed the meeting where a fine was approved, is on weak ground regardless of whether the underlying rule is valid. Ask to see the minutes.
Cost-share programs can still offset a conversion even without a legal override. See what is currently available on our Wyoming rebate page, including the Clear Creek Conservation District turf conversion rebate, which reimburses up to 70 percent of project cost, capped at $2,500 per property, for homeowners and businesses inside the district's boundaries around Buffalo. The last published application deadline was May 15, 2026, so check with the district for the current cycle before you plan around it.
What your HOA can still require
Given how little Wyoming law limits an association, it helps to be realistic about what a board can enforce through a clearly written, currently valid declaration:
- Turf grass, or a minimum percentage of lawn, where the declaration says so plainly
- Pre-approval of landscaping changes through an architectural review committee
- Maintenance standards covering dead plants, overgrowth, and edging
- Height limits near sidewalks, driveways, and street sight lines
- Rules about raised beds, borders, trellises, and other structures
- Setback and screening requirements
- Restrictions on rooftop solar panels and their placement

The practical difference from a state like Texas is that a clearly written and currently enforceable Wyoming turf requirement is likely to hold up as written. The more productive path is usually to design something the review committee can approve, rather than to argue that a statute overrides the declaration.
How to respond when the rules feel unfair
Even without a landscaping statute behind you, a calm and documented approach settles most of these disputes. Four steps, in order:
- 1Ask for the rule in writing.Request the exact recorded provision the association is citing, by section. A verbal warning is not an enforceable violation, and seeing the language often reveals the rule says less than the board believes.
- 2Check the age of the covenant.Ask when the declaration was first recorded. If it is older than roughly forty years, a title company can tell you whether the restriction is still alive under W.S. 34-10-101 through 109 or whether it lapsed with no notice ever filed to preserve it. This is the single question most Wyoming homeowners never think to ask.
- 3Document uneven enforcement.Photograph comparable yards that have not been cited, with dates. Because a Wyoming association's authority rests entirely on a private agreement, evidence that it is applied inconsistently carries weight and often gets a citation withdrawn.
- 4Submit a tidy plan.Give the architectural review committee something concrete to approve: a plant list, a simple layout, and a maintenance schedule. A neat, clearly intentional design is far easier for a board to accept than a request framed as a challenge.

When to involve a lawyer
Because Wyoming gives you so little to cite on your own, a short attorney consultation is worth more here than in a state with a landscaping statute. Consider one if:
- You are being fined and cannot tell whether the declaration supports the citation
- The association is threatening a lien
- Your subdivision is old enough that the forty-year marketable title question applies, and you need a title search to confirm it
- You suspect selective enforcement and want to know how strong that position is
A Wyoming real estate attorney or title company can read your declaration, pull your chain of title, and tell you quickly whether a rule, or the covenant itself, still holds. Given how completely Wyoming leans on that document, one consultation is often worth it before you commit to either a fight or a redesign.
This is not legal advice.
We are a gardening app, not lawyers. This post summarizes publicly available Wyoming law as of 2026. Wyoming has no native-plant or landscaping-protection statute and no general homeowners association act, your recorded declaration controls your situation, and every dispute is different. If you are facing fines or legal threats, or think the forty-year marketable title question applies to your property, talk to a real estate attorney or title company in Wyoming.
People also ask
Does Wyoming have a law protecting native landscaping from HOAs?
No. Wyoming has no native-plant, pollinator, or xeriscape statute, and nothing comparable to Texas Property Code §202.007 or California Civil Code §4735. If your recorded declaration clearly requires turf grass, Wyoming law generally lets the association enforce it. Your leverage comes from the wording of the declaration, whether the board followed its own procedure, and whether it enforces the rule uniformly.
Does Wyoming have a general homeowners association act?
No, not for a standard single-family subdivision. Wyoming Statutes Title 34 has no chapter creating an HOA act. Condominiums have a short, four-section Condominium Ownership Act (W.S. 34-20-101 to 104), and an incorporated HOA of any kind operates under the general Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation Act (W.S. 17-19-101 to 1807) for corporate governance. Neither says anything about landscaping. A standard subdivision HOA runs almost entirely on its recorded declaration.
Can an old Wyoming HOA covenant expire on its own after enough years?
Possibly, which makes Wyoming unusual among no-statute states. Wyoming's marketable title law (W.S. 34-10-101 through 109) can void a recorded use restriction, including a subdivision's landscaping covenant, after forty years from the root of title unless it was preserved by a recorded notice of claim or by a deed in the chain of title that specifically identifies the recorded covenant. This only applies to older subdivisions, requires a title search to confirm the dates, and does not apply if the restriction was preserved in either of those ways. Confirm with a title company or attorney before relying on it.
Does Wyoming's Solar Rights Act protect solar panels from HOA restrictions?
No. The Solar Rights Act (W.S. 34-22-101 through 106) governs line-of-sight disputes between neighboring property owners over shading and sets up a local government permit system for solar collectors. It says nothing about homeowners associations, declarations, or covenants, so it gives you no leverage against a board that restricts or requires approval for rooftop solar.
Can a Wyoming HOA make me keep a grass lawn?
If the recorded declaration clearly requires turf grass or a minimum percentage of lawn, then generally yes, and Wyoming has no statute overriding that requirement the way Texas does. A vague tidiness or maintenance clause is not the same as a turf mandate, though, and inconsistent enforcement, or a covenant that lapsed under the forty-year marketable title rule, can undercut a citation.
Planning a native yard in Wyoming?
Pollinator Patch helps you build a plant plan that fits your declaration, with the tidy documentation review committees respond to. Plant list, layout, and maintenance schedule, all printable.


